We generally only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Edge. Looking back at Blackmagic Design history, this is the third video format that the company proposes to its most demanding customers:.
Ten years ago, the Blackmagic decks could already record to Uncompressed YUV and RGB formats, but the huge bitrates for real-time recording required very expensive storage systems.
Despite support by Adobe, and being an open specification, this format failed to become mainstream. Finally, in fall , Blackmagic Design present its own RAW video format, designed in-house with the ambition of becoming an industry standard. When we repair corrupted BRAW footage, you don't have to worry about using the clips in your project. Repaired videos work just like normal ones. Quality-wise, they are indistinguishable.
From the sensor, through to the raw codec, and then post-production — a feat that AFAIK no other camera maker has achieved. And sure, BMD are not your typical camera maker, as their main business is rather broadcast support equipment — and I think I may be wrong tho that their camera division came about so they can put Resolve into the hands of more users that otherwise would not have access to….
I am far from a colourist, and rather someone with basic knowledge and skills in Resolve. However, I was pleasantly surprised how flexible and easy to grade these 12K files are. In the downloadable footage — there are some 4K crop slow-motion, which is a bit soft, which is expected, but the 8K and 12K footage and the detail they are full of, are nothing short of incredible. Is all I can say. I don't know about you, but for me, this cam is a game changer!
Is in a completely new ground compared to DSLRs. Also kudos to BM to release these files before the camera shipping but really they know how good their product is.
I was waiting for kinefinity's camera but I'm sold. Just pre-ordered this baby! Just a note. You can convert it to cineform and use firstlight for grading too I did something unique in less than 1 min with shot 3 on it. Seriously, I'm shocked! I'm showing the graded footage to my felay at the post house and everyone is saying the same. It's a cinema camera for the masses really. I mean it. For the first time I could push footage in a way I liked with breaking it apart. At least footage from MKII.
It's a gap I couldn't reach until now. That's why ti's a game changer, at least for me. I'm still not sold on this camera either. But then again, these clips show how much better the resulting footage of this camera is compared to the MKIII. You should try it. Skin tones are just If you want to replicate that "Bourne" tone. You can! You can Tint it, shade it It's really like working with RED footage, but I prefered this material.
True but don't you think the color space and workflow make up for the add ons? If you want to take both video and stills, the 5D3 might be your choice. But it depends on the person do you shoot more video than stills? Stills to video? Also download the RAW footage Add a few CF cards and it's 3, You can go handheld if you want, but your footage won't look that much better than the BMCC handled. Haha at this point I agree.
This camera shouldn't be compared to DSLRs Are their going to be limitations with the camera, such as a smaller sensor? Yes, but ALL cameras have limitations.
This camera, as you put it, is a game changer. I'm Comparing them because they're the two cameras that I'm considering. Logan for any serious camera out there you'll have to buy SSD drives, or at least something more expensive than canon media. If you need to take pictures as well this is not a camera for you. You can't compare this camera with Mark III in any way, they are different cameras for different things. I can't download the clips at the moment, away from my computer.
Do the clips contain any low light night shots of the actress on the street or anything? This is a bit off topic, but it's something that I've been wondering about and has been keeping me from ordering this camera It was generally ok, but sometimes got really slow, especially once I had graded all the footage using Magic Bullet Looks. Anyway, I'm already considering building a hackintosh or holding out to see what happens with the MacPros, but am trying to figure out what the real cost of this camera would be once I have to consider my workflow.
Yeah Luke. But, you don't really cut the raw, you convert to Pro Res or something that you can edit just fine, go back to the raw to color, then master. It's really not a big deal unless you just haven't updated your computing system in say four years. Sadly, right now I'm throwing a tantrum because I've got to make a switch on my mobile computing situation, and for the first time I'm feeling like I have to have a Macbook Pro.
This camera just proved to us that anything that Trolls have been saying lately is just that, trolling. Nobody can say shit about it now. And please don't even say "small sensor", that is so stupid it actually gives me the right to hit you. Weeeell, I dunno.
I think I'll wait for the 8k full frame version that takes PL mount and still uses SD cards - probably same price, right? I feel like a lot of people haven't ever used any of these cameras before, and are just picking sides to have something to argue about. Small sensor. Its the reason why it is so cheap. They had to compromise somehow.
Oh well, super 16 is way smaller, and I've seen some pretty movies made with that. One thing I have always been wary of with this camera is low light performance. Every camera will have noise at high ISO values so it comes down to how much detail they preserve after de noising. That means the most to me. These files hold onto a ton of the original detail. It's cool. My main concern was low light. I also like grain but not the blocky DSLR grain.
This was beautiful and held detail well. That's just how it's gonna be. Exactly Kholi. Noise is there because an RAW camera gives you everything. Noise is there with ALL cameras at higher ISO,s it's just that any non raw workflow will mean the camera is doing a lot of in-camera noise reduction. You can use the NR function in Resolve if you want to emulate this, but itsn't it nice to have the option? I think too, a lot of people find the noise less objectionable and describe it as being film like for one reason.
No compression. I think you get concatenation when you take noise and add high compression. Noise with no compression looks quite different to me. Indeed, indeed. This noise is nothing like the noise we've been seeing in prosumer cameras, and honestly has a very different print than that of Epic. And, it's a heck of a lot less noisier than Scarlet in my experience. Mildly denoising, getting rid of chroma noise and only leaving luminance, turns this into something that really REALLY smacks of super It's hard not to get fooled into think that's exactly what it is.
Anyway, good thing Resolve comes with what's supposed to be an updated Noise Reduction setup! Choose your battles. Simply amazing. I'm still hesitant to drop the "A word" - but man
0コメント